IMT – ORIGINS

IMT EVOLUTION

Interspatial Manifold Theory (IMT) was born out of a drive to explain gravity, although inspiration for the theory actually came from looking at a different problem.  The theory evolved from a question I (and everyone else) had regarding the behavior of particles in the double slit experiment.  A question I was asking, as I thought it might point to a more insightful question, in relation to my interest in quantum gravity.

Instead of question though, I was pointed in the direction of an answer. IMT.

The inspiration that is; IMT, has evolved rapidly through a number of unexpected revelations that support the construct and provided insight into fields I would never have expected to find original understanding, had I even dared venture there.

I have always believed that asking the right question is equally as important as having the right information.
I have always believed that asking the right question is equally as important as having the right information.

MATTER / ANTIMATTER

The basis of the theory revolves around matter / antimatter symmetry.

Current theories struggle with the apparent imbalance of matter/antimatter in the universe, but I believe the fact that IMT restores the balance, is not only our first step forward, but, a step that continues to reinforce IMT as a viable theory.

IMT proposes that antimatter is separated from normal matter by an interspacial manifold.  To clarify, IMT proposes that antimatter exists within the manifold.

This perception also gives rise to questions regarding the boundaries of the manifold.  In this, IMT is proposing the manifold to be a singular entity, as is our own matter space.

For the purpose of a frame of reference in discussions throughout this theory, I am suggesting a perception where the manifold presents as a membrane between matter and antimatter.  This shouldn’t, however, occlude the basic understanding that antimatter exists within the manifold.

As we move forward you will see that the membrane analogy provides a perceptual framework that simplifies, but doesn’t undermine, the construct of the theory.